-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make "as a download" and "obtaining a file name" more explicit #4518
Labels
clarification
Standard could be clearer
Comments
annevk
added
clarification
Standard could be clearer
good first issue
Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project
labels
Apr 10, 2019
I would like to work on this one. Is it open? |
Yes, this is still a problem worthy of addressing. |
Ok. How do I start? I'm a first-timer |
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
The issue is still open, but if you want to address it you'll have to figure out from the README and other instructions in the repository how go about creating a PR. Unfortunately nobody has the bandwidth to walk someone through this at the moment. |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
annevk
removed
the
good first issue
Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project
label
Aug 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Followup issue for #4450:
It would be better to turn as a download into a more explicit list of steps (if to be aborted, if the resource was successfully obtained, if need a file name, etc.).
Also it would be better to make "obtaining a file name" a more explicit algorithm on its own. Currently the algorithm simply comes after as a download and doesn't have a explicit name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: