[Minutes] SG Minutes 2020-09-09

[annevk]

Present: @foolip, @othermaciej, and @annevk.

BSD licensing (see #115) is awaiting input from legal on a new proposal to allow usage in software using a different copyright notice as the proposed dual licensing wasn’t acceptable to everyone.

Browser testing spec (see #140):

• Need to define a new Workstream. Scope definition needs to go via legal, which can be a bit of a process. So having the scope definition as soon as possible would be good. (Might also have to be a bit more detailed than existing scopes; paragraph-ish.)
• Doesn’t seem like it would be in scope for an existing Workstream.
• Seems worth doing even if it’s kinda small. Could be the Infra Standard for testing.
• https://whatwg.org/workstream-policy#workstream-proposals has guidelines.

(See #63) Discussed whether we can make it easier to contribute typo fixes, but it’s difficult due to the WHATWG wanting a non-exclusive copyright grant. A possible option might be to have a checkbox in the pull request template.