Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.9. Enumerations - Incorrect wording #972

Closed
oyvindfr opened this issue Mar 31, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1173
Closed

2.9. Enumerations - Incorrect wording #972

oyvindfr opened this issue Mar 31, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1173
Labels
editorial Changes that do not affect how the standard is understood. good first issue Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project

Comments

@oyvindfr
Copy link

This doesn't make any sense to me: "The behavior when a string value that is not one a valid enumeration value is used when assigning to an attribute, or passed as an operation argument, whose type is the enumeration, is language binding specific."

I believe the word "one" should not have been there.

@annevk annevk added editorial Changes that do not affect how the standard is understood. good first issue Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project labels Apr 12, 2021
chansuke added a commit to chansuke/webidl that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2022
annevk pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial Changes that do not affect how the standard is understood. good first issue Ideal for someone new to a WHATWG standard or software project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants