Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mechanism filtering by provider #252

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 27, 2015

Conversation

dmlloyd
Copy link
Contributor

@dmlloyd dmlloyd commented Jul 24, 2015

No description provided.

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 661 is now running using a merge of ff19c4d

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 667 is now running using a merge of ff19c4d

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 661 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of ff19c4d
Summary: Tests passed: 578, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:52

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 667 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of ff19c4d
Summary: Tests passed: 578, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:02:15

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 669 is now running using a merge of 0776a2f

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 663 is now running using a merge of 0776a2f

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 663 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 0776a2f
Summary: Tests passed: 578, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:48

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 669 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 0776a2f
Summary: Tests passed: 578, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:02:16

@darranl darranl added the +1 DAL label Jul 27, 2015
@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 675 is now running using a merge of 0776a2f

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 669 is now running using a merge of 0776a2f

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 669 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 0776a2f
Summary: Tests passed: 580, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:52

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 675 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 0776a2f
Summary: Tests passed: 580, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:02:17

@darranl darranl removed the +1 DAL label Jul 27, 2015
newProps.put(SaslFactories.PROVIDER_FILTER_KEY, predicate);
}
return super.createSaslServer(mechanism, protocol, serverName, newProps, cbh);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this missing the getMechanismNames call to also pass the predicate through?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, you are right.

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 671 is now running using a merge of 09b0706

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 677 is now running using a merge of 09b0706

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Linux Build 671 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 09b0706
Summary: Tests passed: 580, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:01:51

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Windows Build 677 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 09b0706
Summary: Tests passed: 580, ignored: 3 Build time: 0:02:17

@darranl darranl added the +1 DAL label Jul 27, 2015
darranl added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2015
@darranl darranl merged commit f0dcc44 into wildfly-security:master Jul 27, 2015
@dmlloyd dmlloyd deleted the sasl-filter-by-prov branch July 27, 2015 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants