New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WFLY-7628 Distributed EJB timers #15053
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@chengfang @rhusar @rachmatowicz Please review |
github-actions
bot
added
the
deps-changed
Dependencies have been checked, and there are changes highlighted in a comment
label
Dec 24, 2021
FYI this presently has a merge conflict. |
pferraro
force-pushed
the
WFLY-7628
branch
3 times, most recently
from
January 20, 2022 01:14
25b9c2e
to
118ac7c
Compare
pferraro
force-pushed
the
WFLY-7628
branch
6 times, most recently
from
February 8, 2022 19:12
bca6654
to
c5befcc
Compare
pferraro
force-pushed
the
WFLY-7628
branch
3 times, most recently
from
February 23, 2022 20:30
bb1dd51
to
b040986
Compare
pferraro
force-pushed
the
WFLY-7628
branch
5 times, most recently
from
February 27, 2022 14:02
a289db1
to
e434b3b
Compare
pferraro
force-pushed
the
WFLY-7628
branch
3 times, most recently
from
March 8, 2022 20:02
431ce63
to
cddac7d
Compare
…ce management resource must still reference a canceled timer.
… alternate to default-data-store is undefined. Use new distributable timer service implementation when enabled or when specified via deployment descriptor.
…ource to enable support for passivating transient timers.
…t via deployment descriptor.
…r timer persistence.
…timer service via ejb3 subsystem, while DistributedTimerServiceTestCase configures distributed timer service via deployment descriptor.
…xcluding ejb-local-cache.
fabiobrz
approved these changes
Jul 20, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am approving the PR changes, specifically with respect to the tests development and community documentation.
pferraro
removed
the
missing-reqs
Features missing one or more of the pre-merge requirements
label
Jul 20, 2022
Thanks @pferraro. It's about time! :-D |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-7628
Analysis document: wildfly/wildfly-proposals#443