Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[WLFY-1518] HornetQBackupActivationTestCase intermittent failure #4639

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[WLFY-1518] HornetQBackupActivationTestCase intermittent failure #4639

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jmesnil
Copy link
Member

@jmesnil jmesnil commented Jun 14, 2013

swallop up the underlying ExecutionException on :reload operation
execution (when the server is reloaded, the client may lose the
connection before the operation result returns).

@jmesnil
[WLFY-1518] HornetQBackupActivationTestCase intermittent failure
9be6ca6 
swallow up the underlying ExecutionException on :reload operation
execution (when the server is reloaded, the client may lose the
connection before the operation result returns).
@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Triggering build using a merge of 9be6ca6 on branch master:
Private: http://lightning.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/jenkins/job/wildfly-param-pull/

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Build 7446 is now running using a merge of 9be6ca6 on branch master:
Private: http://lightning.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/jenkins/job/wildfly-param-pull/7446

@wildfly-ci
Copy link

Build 7446 outcome was SUCCESS using a merge of 9be6ca6 on branch master:
Private: http://lightning.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/jenkins/job/wildfly-param-pull/7446
Public: http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/wildfly-param-pull/7446

@jaikiran
Copy link
Contributor

Merged

@jaikiran jaikiran closed this Jun 14, 2013
@wolfc
Copy link
Contributor

wolfc commented Jun 18, 2013

On what merit has this been merged?

@jaikiran
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Carlo,

This was merged as a short term hack to prevent the intermittent failures http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/2013-June/000335.html. Emanuel suggested in that dev discussion that he would look at the reload operation in general.

The other option is to @ignore the test for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@jmesnil @wildfly-ci @jaikiran @wolfc