-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WINDUP-723 Improve TypeReferenceLocation javadoc #663
Conversation
(14:08:08) mbriskar: ozizka, it will. implements/extends is transitive (14:08:28) mbriskar: ozizka, even method_call probably is transitive
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
* int foo = mypackage.MyConstants.FOO; | ||
* </pre> | ||
*/ | ||
VARIABLE_INITIALIZER("Variable Initializer"); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would also somehow provide examples and this comment: " TYPE is registered as soon as a java class is found, transitively on superclasses. Then Implements/EXTENDS are registered transitively on both, interfaces/classes and also all the method_calls are registered transitively but only transitively on the interfaces (not extensions)"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1. Examples of code which is matched by particular location.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
WINDUP-723 Improve TypeReferenceLocation javadoc
(14:08:08) mbriskar: ozizka, it will. implements/extends is transitive
(14:08:28) mbriskar: ozizka, even method_call probably is transitive