New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release 2018-04 follow-up #664
Comments
audit-trail:
beta1 (2018-09-30 Python-3.7.1rc1, ipython-7.0)
beta2 (october 14th : Python-3.7.1rc2 + numpy patch for python-3.7)
rc (mid november: Python-3.7.1, matplotlib-3.0, IPython-7.0, pandas-0.23.5)
AOB:
|
build1 2018-09-30 (Jupyterlab-0.34.12, Python-3.7.1rc1) Changes from WinPython 2018-03:
Areas of particular interest for testers:
Focus of next build:
History of changes for WinPython-64bit 3.7.1.0b1The following changes were made to WinPython-64bit distribution since version 3.7.0.2. Python packagesNew packages:
Upgraded packages:
Removed packages:
|
challenge for beta2: choosing 20Mo (or more) to remove from this:
WinPython 3.6.7.0Qt5The following packages are included in WinPython-64bit v3.6.7.0Qt5 (too big b1 attempt). Tools
Python packages
|
hum, looking further:
I think the wise option is to remove tensorflow |
build2 2018-10-14 (Jupyterlab-0.35.1, Python-3.7.1rc2) Changes from WinPython 2018-04 build1:
Areas of particular interest for testers:
Focus of next build:
History of changes for WinPython-64bit 3.7.1.0 b2The following changes were made to WinPython-64bit distribution since version 3.7.0.2. ToolsUpgraded packages:
Python packagesNew packages:
Upgraded packages:
Removed packages:
|
it's a bit of fun discussion of what an editor shall be for student engineer IT education:
|
Please please reconsider tensorflow ... It is the default deep learning library in many institutions and I had a hard time asking the students to install it themselves... Why not remove Theano? Since Theano has very very smaller use than tensorflow. See: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=tensorflow,theano |
hi @wmac:
|
@stonebig thanks for your attention.
Or as you said recently, if a new installer can be utilized, most volume related choices are eliminated... |
I don't quite understand why nsis 2.46 fails me at about 2.3 Go, as the limit should be 4 Go at minimum. Adding ram may not help, as:
==> So the only true solution is to change of installer, apparently there is choice, according to https://windowsreport.com/software-package-installer/
It's a bit painfull task to test then change of installer. Let suppose I reduce the problem by 50%:
It looks doable (yet not super simple) : https://sevenzip.osdn.jp/chm/cmdline/switches/sfx.htm |
rc 2018-11-01 Changes from WinPython 2018-04 build2:
Areas of particular interest for testers:
|
Really appreciate your time and contribution to python users (specially academic community). Bow perhaps we can even see PyTorch in future :) |
No problem: make PyTorch work greater on AMD and INTEL gpu then competition. |
rc2 preparation:
|
rc2 2018-11-01: Tweaks from WinPython 2018-04 rc:
History of changes for WinPython-64bit 3.6.7.0Qt5 rc2The following changes were made to WinPython-64bit distribution since version 3.6.6.2Qt5. ToolsUpgraded packages:
Python packagesNew packages:
Upgraded packages:
Removed packages:
|
Estimated release date: 2018-10-31
expected:
Focus of the release:
non-effort of the release:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: