feat: detect team app lock change (WPB-4476)

[ohassine]

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Description

In this PR I:

• Added w new feature flag to default.json, to enforce team app lock from there.
• Added isChanged value that will be used by client to display a dialog in case the config has changed.
• Refactored abit to avoid some duplication
• Added/adjusted some unit test

Dependencies (Optional)

Needed for wireapp/wire-android#2388

How to Test

Not testable only logic here

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results

   384 files   -   83     384 suites   - 83   18s ⏱️ - 2m 12s
2 241 tests  - 364  2 175 ✔️  - 326  66 💤  - 38  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d217e60. ± Comparison against base commit 323edb6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: detect_team_app_lock_change
Commit report: 80fcc8e

✅ kalium-jvm: 0 Failed, 0 New Flaky, 2508 Passed, 104 Skipped, 7m 10s Wall Time

[borichellow]

LGTM, just a small code style suggestion :)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2183 (d217e60) into develop (323edb6) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 62.33%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #2183      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      57.94%   57.93%   -0.02%     
  Complexity        21       21              
=============================================
  Files           1067     1069       +2     
  Lines          40544    40588      +44     
  Branches        3749     3757       +8     
=============================================
+ Hits           23495    23515      +20     
- Misses         15433    15453      +20     
- Partials        1616     1620       +4     

Files	Coverage Δ
...re/kalium/logic/configuration/AppLockTeamConfig.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ium/logic/data/featureConfig/FeatureConfigModel.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...eature/applock/AppLockTeamFeatureConfigObserver.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../applock/MarkTeamAppLockStatusAsNotifiedUseCase.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...om/wire/kalium/logic/featureFlags/KaliumConfigs.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...n/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/logic/data/event/Event.kt	80.59% <0.00%> (ø)
...um/logic/data/featureConfig/FeatureConfigMapper.kt	70.78% <50.00%> (-1.13%)	⬇️
...ture/featureConfig/handler/AppLockConfigHandler.kt	72.72% <66.66%> (-27.28%)	⬇️
...ire/kalium/persistence/config/UserConfigStorage.kt	75.12% <57.14%> (-4.34%)	⬇️
...kalium/logic/configuration/UserConfigRepository.kt	52.63% <37.93%> (-1.84%)	⬇️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 323edb6...d217e60. Read the comment docs.