skip local event check #732
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bennycode
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2017
|
|
||
| future_sessions = [] | ||
| @logger.info "Fetched pre-keys for '#{Object.keys(user_pre_key_map).length}' users.", user_pre_key_map |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you really want to make this an info message? Info loggings are quite verbose.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
w00t. it was you who added this logging
lipis
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2017
herrmannplatz
force-pushed
the
improvement/skip-local-event-check
branch
from
34982aa
to
251c0e2
Compare
lipis
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2017
bennycode
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No need to look up every message we decrypt. Proteus.errors.DecryptError.DuplicateMessage errors are handled and ignored anyway