Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tunneldigger: Bumped package version. #10

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kratz00
Copy link

@kratz00 kratz00 commented Oct 14, 2016

The current hash references a tunneldigger revision which is over one year old.
Freifunk Franken is using this package feed to include tunneldigger in their firmware and we would like to benefit from all the enhancements of the current tunneldigger version.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Pankratz <kratz00@gmx.de>
@mitar
Copy link
Member

mitar commented Oct 15, 2016

Current version is not yet necessary stable. We heard negative reports. @kostko?

@kratz00
Copy link
Author

kratz00 commented Oct 15, 2016

That makes sense.
Is there a stable version, which is newer than the version which is currently referenced in the package Makefile?

@kostko
Copy link
Member

kostko commented Oct 15, 2016

Current version is not yet necessary stable. We heard negative reports.

That was for the broker, the client should be fine. @lynxis what do you think?

@kratz00
Copy link
Author

kratz00 commented Oct 19, 2016

Any news?

@lynxis
Copy link
Contributor

lynxis commented Oct 20, 2016

There is still the "Sun Oct 16 15:29:15 2016 daemon.warn td-client: Received error response from broker!"
from the client connecting to a new broker.

@kostko
Copy link
Member

kostko commented Oct 20, 2016

There is still the "Sun Oct 16 15:29:15 2016 daemon.warn td-client: Received error response from broker!" from the client connecting to a new broker.

Which broker? This can also happen if the broker has reached its defined connection limit count and is rejecting connections.

@kratz00
Copy link
Author

kratz00 commented Oct 26, 2016

As the latest version may or may not have known issues,
is there a stable version, which is newer than the version which is currently referenced in the package Makefile, which we can use in the meantime, until things have been sorted out?

@kostko
Copy link
Member

kostko commented Oct 26, 2016

No. But you can test revision 0bae1419da12de64d1c7571c5f6649d39d682052 on a few devices and if you find no issues we can merge this.

RedDog99 pushed a commit to FreifunkFranken/firmware that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2016
Because we want to test this tunneldigger version in order to move on
with wlanslovenija/firmware-packages-opkg#10

Signed-off-by: Steffen Pankratz <kratz00@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Christian Dresel <fff@chrisi01.de>
Tested-by: Robert Langhammer rlanghammer@web.de
Reviewed-by: Jan Kraus <mayosemmel@gmail.com>
@kratz00
Copy link
Author

kratz00 commented Nov 4, 2016

As you may have already noticed, revision 0bae1419da12de64d1c7571c5f6649d39d682052 of tunneldigger is included in the Freifunk Franken firmware now.
We will soon release a new beta version of this firmware for testing.

@robimarko robimarko closed this Sep 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants