Update readme with new API updates #39
Conversation
toban
commented
May 28, 2021
toban
commented
- Item statement reconciliation
- Property lookup by label
|
It looks great 😍 Tho, as per the ticket I would add a mention to Federated properties to the list named "This code is currently work in progress and some things are thus known to not to work:" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks great heart_eyes Tho, as per the ticket I would add a mention to Federated properties to the list named "This code is currently work in progress and some things are thus known to not to work:"
Also, several other items of that list should be removed by now.
README.md
Outdated
| @@ -115,6 +115,62 @@ Follow the instructions [here](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/OAuth/Owner-only_c | |||
|
|
|||
| For an example on how to request a edit token and make an authenticated request using OAuth see the [example python script](example/oauth/main.py). | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Property lookup by name | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think both “property lookup by name” and “statement reconciliation” should be subsections of the minimal input format, since we don’t support them for the full input format.
guergana
force-pushed
the
update-readme
branch
3 times, most recently
from
a543020
to
575251a
Compare
README.md
Outdated
| @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ This code is currently **work in progress** and some things are thus **known to | |||
| * 0.0.1/minimal statement value parsing options (such as language), could lead to "interesting" things | |||
| * Anything to do with references, qualifiers | |||
| * Statement ranks and sitelink badges may have an undetermined behavior | |||
| * Editing always has a fixed user and summary currently, and token validation etc does not happen | |||
| * Property lookup by name and Statement reconciliation are currently only supported for the minimal input format. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm, I don’t think that’s a limitation? It wouldn’t make sense to support them in the full input format IMHO, that format is supposed to be identical to the Wikibase JSON.
- Item statement reconciliation - Property lookup by label (does not work with FP)
|
Nice, reads and looks good to me 👍 |
