Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Path conditions per pipeline #86

Closed
laszlocph opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Path conditions per pipeline #86

laszlocph opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
pipeline-config related to pipeline config files (.yaml)
Milestone
1.0.0

Comments

@laszlocph
Copy link
Member

laszlocph commented Nov 11, 2019 •
edited

Trigger the pipeline only if the git changeset is part of predefined paths.
@anbraten anbraten mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2021
Closed
@anbraten anbraten added the pipeline-config related to pipeline config files (.yaml) label Sep 19, 2021
@anbraten anbraten added this to the 0.15.0 milestone Nov 13, 2021
@6543 6543 modified the milestones: 0.15.0, 0.16.0 Nov 18, 2021
@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Aug 31, 2022

-included in #283

@6543 6543 closed this as completed Aug 31, 2022
@strk
Copy link
Contributor

strk commented Jul 5, 2023

Is path condition now supported ? Can you give an example of that ?

robe2 pushed a commit to postgis/postgis that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2023
@strk
[woodie] Drop the docs/ conditional
917ca73 
I dunno how to make it work effectively with multi-step pipelines
See woodpecker-ci/woodpecker#86
@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Jul 5, 2023

https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/master/.woodpecker/test.yml#L27-L29

@woodpecker-ci woodpecker-ci locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 5, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
pipeline-config related to pipeline config files (.yaml)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@strk @laszlocph @anbraten @6543