Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Term mutation, absint() error. #184

Conversation

jasonbahl
Copy link
Collaborator

This fixes a mistake in the termObjectMutation where absint() was getting too many params passed.

That means parent's were never able to actually be set. . .so I fixed this. . .and added a test to make sure that a parent term could actually be set when doing a mutation.

While in there, I also added a "parent" field for hierarchical taxonomies.

So, this pr addresses #183 and #133

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 27, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 93.181% when pulling 6bbfcb0 on jasonbahl:feature/#183-term-parent-mutation-bug into 9942430 on wp-graphql:master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants