You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Yes it can. In fact there's no need for a for loop. Just use coverm genome -m rpkm relative_abundance ....
The exception is coverage histogram since the shape of the output is different.
To save mapping CPU time, you could use use a bam cache.
HTH, ben
-\-------------
Ben Woodcroft
Group leader, Centre for Microbiome Research, QUT
________________________________
From: Xi Chen ***@***.***>
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 6:17:58 PM
To: wwood/CoverM ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: [wwood/CoverM] multiple methods in a single run (Issue #119)
Hello,
Does coverM currently support multiple methods (e.g. mean + variance) as output?
Thanks!
for method in rpkm coverage_histogram relative_abundance mean variance
do
coverm genome --bam-files $bam \
--genome-fasta-directory mags \
--genome-fasta-extension fa \
--methods $method \
--threads 20 \
--output-file coverage/$method.tsv
done
―
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#119>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAADX5CDG3SYMKDUFUKVMRLVNG5TNANCNFSM5XXXVRTA>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Hello,
Does coverM currently support multiple methods (e.g. mean + variance) as output?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: