Please harmonize the "jump signs"

[jvoisin]

Currently, x64dbg it using > and a custom red v, it would be great to replace > with a red thingy :)

[mrexodia]

Also maybe remove those rather pointless dots?

[prolium]

@mrexodia i thought they had different meanings !
isn't the red ones v indicate that this instruction will branch, while the black ones > indicate that there are references to this instruction ?!

[mrexodia]

Yes indeed but this issue refers to the custom drawing of the references
thing.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 at 12:53, wk notifications@github.com wrote:

@mrexodia https://github.com/mrexodia i thought they had different
meanings !
isn't the red ones v indicate that this instruction will branch, while
the black ones > indicate that there are references to this instruction ?!

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#815 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ACWCmYwX2oO2A0HlR3KB4xqg_vG8HMAPks5qSje5gaJpZM4JDtK-
.

[wynick27]

Currently the indicator has the same meaning as ollydbg, > means jump reference, $ means call reference, . means analyzed(inside a known function). By the time this part was written, encodemap is not implemented, . indicator should be set if the current instruction has analysis info (encode type other than enc_unknown).

[mrexodia]

Yes but he was referring to custom drawing them instead of displaying text.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 at 04:55, Yun Wei notifications@github.com wrote:

Currently the indicator has the same meaning as ollydbg, > means jump
reference, $ means call reference, . means analyzed(inside a known
function).

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#815 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ACWCmcwz_1vWIBLVQFgkKfQpBf7Q_sUEks5qUbCUgaJpZM4JDtK-
.