Invalidate path hash on remove so the infoscanner can pick it up again #5587
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
jenkins build this please |
|
Nice find. Looks like those path invalidation queries never worked. |
MartijnKaijser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2014
Invalidate path hash on remove so the infoscanner can pick it up again
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes an issue reported on the forums where a removed movie item is not picked up by the update library routine because you can't query a previously removed fileId :)
Fix for episodes and tvshows has to be done separately as it's a lot more complicated and I don't want to add yet another regression to the upcoming Helix betas at this point.
Bug report @ http://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=207452
Regression introduced with a32dcc1 and some other refactoring (movie vs movieview)
@Montellese, @topfs2 for review please.