Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store: Improved the lockers #54

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023
Merged

store: Improved the lockers #54

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023

Conversation

xescugc
Copy link
Owner

@xescugc xescugc commented Nov 8, 2023

Instead of locking on the 'Reduce' function (which is less repetitive) we lock on the action because if not we are always locking on all the actions (the 'Reduce' function is always called) so when doing it on the actions we only lock when we are actually making use of the map and need it

Instead of locking on the 'Reduce' function (which is less repetitive) we lock on the action
because if not we are always locking on all the actions (the 'Reduce' function is always called)
so when doing it on the actions we only lock when we are actually making use of the map and need it
@xescugc xescugc merged commit 1a71fea into master Nov 8, 2023
@xescugc xescugc deleted the fg-improve-locker branch November 8, 2023 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant