Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing lakes make some maps look awkward #21

Closed
yaph opened this issue Aug 4, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Missing lakes make some maps look awkward #21

yaph opened this issue Aug 4, 2014 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@yaph
Copy link
Owner

yaph commented Aug 4, 2014

Especially the US map without the great lakes. So find a way to incorporate lakes at least in country level maps, even better in all maps, i. e. the topojson sources.

@yaph yaph self-assigned this Aug 4, 2014
@yaph yaph changed the title Missing lakes may make maps look awkward Missing lakes make some maps look awkward Aug 4, 2014
@yaph
Copy link
Owner Author

yaph commented Aug 4, 2014

Look into merging the lakes and admin/countries shapefiles with gdal http://www.gdal.org/drv_shapefile.html

A merge of two shapefiles 'file1.shp' and 'file2.shp' into a new file 'file_merged.shp' is performed like this:

% ogr2ogr file_merged.shp file1.shp
% ogr2ogr -update -append file_merged.shp file2.shp -nln file_merged

The second command is opening file_merged.shp in update mode, and trying to find existing layers and append the features being copied.
The -nln option sets the name of the layer to be copied to.

@yaph yaph closed this as completed in 3c53aaf Oct 7, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant