Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge btrfs_subvols #1172

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Nov 25, 2020
Merged

Merge btrfs_subvols #1172

merged 42 commits into from
Nov 25, 2020

Conversation

joseivanlopez
Copy link
Contributor

@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez commented Nov 25, 2020

NOTE: btrfs_subvols branch should be removed after merging this.

This PR merges btrfs_subvols branch into master. All the code included here was already reviewed. Only the version bump and the chagelog entry is new (last commit).

Here it is included:

@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2020 08:05
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 25, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 97.626% when pulling 782f8a6 on joseivanlopez:merge_btrfs_subvols into fd80178 on yast:master.

Copy link
Contributor

@ancorgs ancorgs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@ancorgs ancorgs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-approved after the git amend.

@ancorgs ancorgs merged commit f3a9103 into yast:master Nov 25, 2020
@yast-bot
Copy link

❌ Public Jenkins job #337 failed

@yast-bot
Copy link

❌ Internal Jenkins job #134 failed

@ancorgs ancorgs mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2020
@ancorgs
Copy link
Contributor

ancorgs commented Nov 25, 2020

Fix for the jenkins failure #1173

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants