Short name control product #975
Conversation
|
✔️ Public Jenkins job #139 successfully finished |
|
✔️ Internal Jenkins job #39 successfully finished |
| @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ def all_products(force_repos: false) | |||
| return Y2Packager::ProductControlProduct.products.each_with_object([]) do |p, result| | |||
| result << Y2Packager::Product.new(name: p.name, display_name: p.label, | |||
| version: p.version, arch: p.arch, | |||
| short_name: p.name, # TODO: verify that name and shortname are same for control products | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jreidinger , @lslezak a TODO could be ignored, shall we create a PBI for it?, Why the short name is not part of the control product definition? Even a comment in the control file could help
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To make the maintenance easier I want to keep only minimal set of data in control.xml. I omitted the short name because it is not needed for registration. Of course, if we need more data we can add it there.
For the current products actually name != short_name, e.g. for SLE15-SP2 it's SLES vs. SLES15-SP2. I do not know if this could make some problems, but maybe it's OK in the early stage before we add the real repositories with real products...
No description provided.