chore(actions): update pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish action to v1.9.0 #9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![renovate[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/2740?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Branch automerge failureThis PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead. |
renovate
bot
changed the title
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypa-gh-action-pypi-publish-1.x
branch
from
0111126
to
99d7d66
Compare
renovate
bot
changed the title
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypa-gh-action-pypi-publish-1.x
branch
from
99d7d66
to
c5e9349
Compare
renovate
bot
changed the title
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypa-gh-action-pypi-publish-1.x
branch
from
c5e9349
to
4cc7dde
Compare
renovate
bot
changed the title
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypa-gh-action-pypi-publish-1.x
branch
from
4cc7dde
to
141d781
Compare
renovate
bot
changed the title
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypa-gh-action-pypi-publish-1.x
branch
from
141d781
to
7b4f523
Compare
renovate
bot
changed the title
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/pypa-gh-action-pypi-publish-1.x
branch
from
7b4f523
to
9533618
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
v1.6.4->v1.9.0Release Notes
pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish (pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish)
v1.9.0Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements
twine uploadcommand via #231🛠️ Internal Dependencies
cryptography == 42.0.7id == 1.4.0idna == 3.7via #228requests == 2.32.0via #240Twine == 5.1.0⚙️ Secret Stuff
In #241, @br3ndonland💰 added a Docker label linking the container image to this repository for GHCR to display it nicely. This is preparatory work for a big performance-focused refactoring he's working on in #230.
💪 New Contributors
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.14...v1.9.0
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
🙏 Special Thanks to @pradyunsg💰 for promptly unblocking this release to Marketplace as GitHub started asking for yet another developer agreement signature from the organization admins.
v1.8.14Compare Source
🛠️ Internal Dependencies
Nothing changed feature-wise. The only notable update is that the underlying container runtime now uses Python 3.12 and pip has been updated to v24.0 there.
This is should go unnoticed in terms of behavior. It's just a bit of maintenance burden to be done occasionally by @webknjaz💰.
Enjoy!
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.13...v1.8.14
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
v1.8.13Compare Source
🐛 What's Fixed
This action is now able to consume and publish distribution packages with
Metadata-Version: 2.3embedded.🛠️ Internal Dependencies
@SigureMo💰 sent us a bump of
pkginfoversion to version 1.10.0 in #219. It's a transitive dependency for us and is not an API-level change but upgrading it has a side effect of letting Twine recognize distribution packages declaringMetadata-Version: 2.3. In particular, it is known to affect distributions built withMaturin >= 1.5.0.Following that, @webknjaz💰 upgraded other transitive and direct dependency pins, including, among others, the following notable bumps:
cryptography == 42.0.5id == 1.3.0readme-renderer == 43.0Twine == 5.0.0💪 New Contributors
@SigureMo made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/219
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.12...v1.8.13
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
v1.8.12Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements
@woodruffw💰 replaced the notice annotations with simplified debug messages related to authentication methanism selection via #196. The also improved the error clarity during OIDC exchange on PRs from forks via #203.
📝 What's Documented
@virtuald💰 updated the docs and pointer messages were updated to mention that reusable workflows aren't supported right now in #186 and @xuanzhi33💰 later corrected the markdown syntax there via #216.
🛠️ Internal Dependencies
⚙️ Secret Stuff
@woodruffw proactively updated the OIDC minting API endpoint used during the exchange via #206. Nothing you should be too concerned about, promise!
💪 New Contributors
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.11...v1.8.12
🧔♂️ Release Manager: @webknjaz 🇺🇦
v1.8.11Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic output improvements
@woodruffw added a nudge suggesting the users storing passwords in a GitHub Actions repository secrets to switch to using secretless publishing in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/190. This also reminds people that PyPI will start mandating two-factor authentication to perform uploads in 2024.
📝 What's Documented
@di linked the configuration docs for Trusted Publishing in README via https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/179.
🛠️ Internal dependencies
💪 New Contributors
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.10...v1.8.11
v1.8.10Compare Source
🐛 What's Fixed
@woodruffw fixed decoding OIDC claims in debug output on failure by applying correct padding to the encoded payload via https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/177.
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.9...v1.8.10
v1.8.9Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic output improvements
🛠️ Internal dependencies
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.8...v1.8.9
v1.8.8Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic output improvements
In https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/167, @woodruffw introduced a nudge-warning encouraging people to start using secretless publishing to PyPI, as suggested by @sethmlarson in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/issues/164, collaborating with @di.
💡 Tip: The OIDC-based trusted publishing integration details can be found in the action README at https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pypi-publish#trusted-publishing and on the PyPI docs page at https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers/. It's gone GA on April 20, 2023, during PyCon: https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2023-04-20-introducing-trusted-publishers/. And the Trail Of Bits blog post has some deeper explanation here: https://blog.trailofbits.com/2023/05/23/trusted-publishing-a-new-benchmark-for-packaging-security/.
🛠️ Internal dependencies
💪 New Contributors
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.7...v1.8.8
v1.8.7Compare Source
💅 Cosmetic output impovements
}from a non-OIDC log annotation in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/161.🛠️ Internal dependencies
💪 New Contributors
🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.6...v1.8.7
v1.8.6Compare Source
What's Updated
passwordfield as required and contributed a correction in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/151New Contributors
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.5...v1.8.6
v1.8.5Compare Source
What's Improved
@woodruffw improved the user-facing documentation and logging to make use of the Trusted Publishing flow terminology cohesive with PyPI in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/143. Trusted Publishing used to be referred to as OpenID Connect (OIDC) — the underlying technology that is being used to make it work. He also made the action display the cause of the Trusted Publishing flow being selected by the action via https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/142.
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.4...v1.8.5
v1.8.4Compare Source
What's Improved
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.3...v1.8.4
v1.8.3Compare Source
What's New
This release improves the logging detalization of which authentication mode is selected when the action runs. It surfaces this detail to the workflow run summary page as annotations. The change was contributed by @woodruffw in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/136.
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.2...v1.8.3
v1.8.2Compare Source
What's Changed
This release started printing out full OIDC error messages to console, instead of just one line -- by @woodruffw in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/134.
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.1...v1.8.2
v1.8.1Compare Source
🐛 What's Fixed
💔 Unfortunately, a tiny mistake in v1.8.0 caused a far-reaching regression for the most used code path.
❗ But don't worry, it's fixed now thanks to @njzjz who promptly spotted it and @zhongjiajie who sent a bugfix.
🙌 New Contributors
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.0...v1.8.1
v1.8.0Compare Source
The Coolest Release Ever!
In this release, @woodruffw implemented support for secretless OIDC-based publishing to PyPI-like package indexes. The OIDC flow is activated when neither username nor password action inputs are set.
The OIDC “token exchange”, is an authentication technique that PyPI (and TestPyPI, and hopefully some future others) supports as an alternative to long-lived username/password combinations or long-lived API tokens.
Setup prerequisites: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pypi-publish#trusted-publishing
PyPI's documentation: https://pypi.org/help/#trusted-publishers
~Beta test enrollment:https://github.com/pypi/warehouse/issues/129655~
New Contributors
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.7.1...v1.8.0
v1.7.1Compare Source
Regression?
There was a small setback with v1.7.0 — the snake_case fallbacks didn't work because the check for the kebab-case env vars with default values set was always truthy. This bugfix release promptly fixes that.
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.7.0...v1.7.1
v1.7.0Compare Source
What should I care about?
TL;DR The action input names have been converted to use kebab-case and marked deprecated. But the old names still work.
This is made to align the public API with the de-facto conventions in the ecosystem. We've used snake_case names, which the maintainer considers a historical mistake. New kebab-case inputs will make the end-users' workflows look more consistent and and visually distinguishable from other identifiers one may encounter in YAML.
There is no timeline for removing the old names, but it will happen in v3 or later versions of the action. If the maintainer doesn't forget to do this, that is.
The patch is here: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/125.
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.6.5...v1.7.0
v1.6.5Compare Source
What's Changed
New Contributors
Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.6.4...v1.6.5
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 12pm every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.