Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Issue 6234 - 64-bit array append generates inline code to copy new da…
…ta, but does not call postblit Call postblit when appending an element on x86-64
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
11 additions
and
3 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
74bbf3b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added as dlang@3a87293
Needed to add code to account for side effects.
74bbf3b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Finally, everything passing! (except freebsd64)
Is there any reason this wasn't done as a merge?
74bbf3b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It wasn't set up as a pull request.
74bbf3b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That shouldn't be a prerequisite for a merge...
I don't know process you've been using (or if there are good reasons for it) but a standard fetch, merge --no-commit, edit, push should let you do the same thing (edit before committing) while preserving author information and keep track of parent commits.
I understand in some cases it's not sufficient, but for simple merge + edits like this it should work.