Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove alpha from additionalQueryParameter and make public #217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 17, 2022

Conversation

juliannzhou
Copy link
Contributor

@juliannzhou juliannzhou commented Aug 17, 2022

This PR removes @alpha tag from additionalQueryParameter and makes it public.

J=SLAP-1398
TEST=manual

Original PR (#79) made this property alpha to prevent access from typescript users of core, but this property can be public after release.

@juliannzhou juliannzhou requested a review from a team as a code owner August 17, 2022 19:41
@juliannzhou juliannzhou changed the base branch from master to develop August 17, 2022 19:42
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2877916873

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 90.408%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2877840179: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 214
Relevant Lines: 231

💛 - Coveralls

@juliannzhou juliannzhou merged commit 1d24810 into develop Aug 17, 2022
@juliannzhou juliannzhou deleted the dev/remove-alpha branch August 17, 2022 19:44
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ export interface BaseSearchConfig {
/**
* Additional query params added on to every request.
*
* @alpha
* @public
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we just remove this tag now since it matches the parent interface's release tag?

@yen-tt yen-tt mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2022
yen-tt added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
## Version 2.0.0

### Changes
- `additionalQueryParameter` is now a public field in `SearchConfig` models (#217)

### Breaking Changes
- Updated default and sandbox URL endpoints from `../answers/..` to `../search/..` as part of rebranding process (#196 )
- Restructured StaticFilters models for better developer experience and enforce proper restriction in the kind of combinations of filters supported by the backend
  - Now, static filters can be either a field value filter or a nested object that is composed by combining field value filters. (#201 )
  - `ConjunctionStaticFilter` and `DisjunctionStaticFilter` models were created to reflect such limitation. For example, ANDs of ORs combination is allowed, ORs of ANDs combination is not allowed.  (#204 )
- Updated `FieldValueDirectAnswer` model to properly handle different `value` types. Previously, FieldValueDirectAnswer interface enforces that the `value` field will always be of type `string`. Now, `FieldValueDirectAnswer` is a union type of predefined interfaces with known `value` type and `UnknownFieldValueDirectAnswer` with a generic `value` type for other `fieldType` outside of `BuiltInFieldType`. (#200 #202 )
   - The newly added built-in interfaces can be found in the document page [**here**](https://github.com/yext/search-core/blob/develop/docs/search-core.fieldvaluedirectanswer.md)  (#206 #208 #210 #211 #205 #209 #203 #220 )
- Narrow down `FeaturedSnippetDirectAnswer` TypeScript model to be a union type of   `MultiLineTextSnippetDirectAnswer` and `RichTextSnippetDirectAnswer` as a featured snippet direct answer can only be of fieldType `multi_line_text` or `rich_text`. (#207 #212 )
- All exports marked as `@deprecated` in previous version(s) as part of the rebranding process is now removed in V2 (#216 )
  - For more details, the deprecated identifiers are listed in [v1.8 release notes](https://github.com/yext/search-core/releases/tag/v1.8.0)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants