Teach the DataLayout aware constant folder to be much more aggressive…

… towards

'and' instructions. This is a pattern that shows up a lot in ubsan binaries.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175128 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp

@@ -536,27 +536,49 @@ static Constant *ConstantFoldLoadInst(const LoadInst *LI, const DataLayout *TD){
 
 /// SymbolicallyEvaluateBinop - One of Op0/Op1 is a constant expression.
 /// Attempt to symbolically evaluate the result of a binary operator merging
-/// these together.  If target data info is available, it is provided as TD,
-/// otherwise TD is null.
+/// these together.  If target data info is available, it is provided as DL,
+/// otherwise DL is null.
 static Constant *SymbolicallyEvaluateBinop(unsigned Opc, Constant *Op0,
-                                           Constant *Op1, const DataLayout *TD){
+                                           Constant *Op1, const DataLayout *DL){
   // SROA
 
   // Fold (and 0xffffffff00000000, (shl x, 32)) -> shl.
   // Fold (lshr (or X, Y), 32) -> (lshr [X/Y], 32) if one doesn't contribute
   // bits.
 
 
+  if (Opc == Instruction::And && DL) {
+    unsigned BitWidth = DL->getTypeSizeInBits(Op0->getType());
+    APInt KnownZero0(BitWidth, 0), KnownOne0(BitWidth, 0);
+    APInt KnownZero1(BitWidth, 0), KnownOne1(BitWidth, 0);
+    ComputeMaskedBits(Op0, KnownZero0, KnownOne0, DL);
+    ComputeMaskedBits(Op1, KnownZero1, KnownOne1, DL);
+    if ((KnownOne1 | KnownZero0).isAllOnesValue()) {
+      // All the bits of Op0 that the 'and' could be masking are already zero.
+      return Op0;
+    }
+    if ((KnownOne0 | KnownZero1).isAllOnesValue()) {
+      // All the bits of Op1 that the 'and' could be masking are already zero.
+      return Op1;
+    }
+
+    APInt KnownZero = KnownZero0 | KnownZero1;
+    APInt KnownOne = KnownOne0 & KnownOne1;
+    if ((KnownZero | KnownOne).isAllOnesValue()) {
+      return ConstantInt::get(Op0->getType(), KnownOne);
+    }
+  }
+
   // If the constant expr is something like &A[123] - &A[4].f, fold this into a
   // constant.  This happens frequently when iterating over a global array.
-  if (Opc == Instruction::Sub && TD) {
+  if (Opc == Instruction::Sub && DL) {
     GlobalValue *GV1, *GV2;
-    unsigned PtrSize = TD->getPointerSizeInBits();
-    unsigned OpSize = TD->getTypeSizeInBits(Op0->getType());
+    unsigned PtrSize = DL->getPointerSizeInBits();
+    unsigned OpSize = DL->getTypeSizeInBits(Op0->getType());
     APInt Offs1(PtrSize, 0), Offs2(PtrSize, 0);
 
-    if (IsConstantOffsetFromGlobal(Op0, GV1, Offs1, *TD))
-      if (IsConstantOffsetFromGlobal(Op1, GV2, Offs2, *TD) &&
+    if (IsConstantOffsetFromGlobal(Op0, GV1, Offs1, *DL))
+      if (IsConstantOffsetFromGlobal(Op1, GV2, Offs2, *DL) &&
           GV1 == GV2) {
         // (&GV+C1) - (&GV+C2) -> C1-C2, pointer arithmetic cannot overflow.
         // PtrToInt may change the bitwidth so we have convert to the right size

test/Transforms/InstCombine/constant-expr-datalayout.ll

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+; RUN: opt -instcombine %s -S -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+
+%test1.struct = type { i32, i32 }
+@test1.aligned_glbl = global %test1.struct zeroinitializer, align 4
+define void @test1(i64 *%ptr) {
+  store i64 and (i64 ptrtoint (i32* getelementptr (%test1.struct* @test1.aligned_glbl, i32 0, i32 1) to i64), i64 3), i64* %ptr
+; CHECK: store i64 0, i64* %ptr
+  ret void
+}