Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix some issues with rematerialization in RegisterCoalescer when the …
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…destination

of the copy is a subregister def. The current code assumes that it can do a full
def of the destination register, but it is not checking that the def operand is
read-undef. It also doesn't clear the subregister index of the destination in
the new instruction to reflect the full subregister def.

These issues were found running 'make check' with my next commit that enables
rematerialization in more cases.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175122 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
  • Loading branch information
zwarich committed Feb 14, 2013
1 parent ad236eb commit c5f1474
Showing 1 changed file with 10 additions and 0 deletions.
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -755,6 +755,10 @@ bool RegisterCoalescer::reMaterializeTrivialDef(LiveInterval &SrcInt,
const MCInstrDesc &MCID = DefMI->getDesc();
if (MCID.getNumDefs() != 1)
return false;
// Only support subregister destinations when the def is read-undef.
MachineOperand &DstOperand = CopyMI->getOperand(0);
if (DstOperand.getSubReg() && !DstOperand.isUndef())
return false;
if (!DefMI->isImplicitDef()) {
// Make sure the copy destination register class fits the instruction
// definition register class. The mismatch can happen as a result of earlier
Expand All @@ -773,6 +777,12 @@ bool RegisterCoalescer::reMaterializeTrivialDef(LiveInterval &SrcInt,
TII->reMaterialize(*MBB, MII, DstReg, 0, DefMI, *TRI);
MachineInstr *NewMI = prior(MII);

// The original DefMI may have been a subregister def, but the full register
// class of its destination matches the destination of CopyMI, and CopyMI is
// either a full register def or is read-undef. Therefore we can clear the
// subregister index on the rematerialized instruction.
NewMI->getOperand(0).setSubReg(0);

// NewMI may have dead implicit defs (E.g. EFLAGS for MOV<bits>r0 on X86).
// We need to remember these so we can add intervals once we insert
// NewMI into SlotIndexes.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit c5f1474

Please sign in to comment.