Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proportion of "good" genes 0, but significant? #23

Closed
magnew1 opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Proportion of "good" genes 0, but significant? #23

magnew1 opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@magnew1
Copy link

magnew1 commented May 14, 2024

Hello! I am running the GO_MWU analysis on oyster transcriptome responses to a virus using log2 fold change values. When I use the log2fold change values, some results give me significant GO terms but their proportion of "good" genes is 0, so I am confused how these can be significant values? I've attached an image of an example output three that I receive. Here's the code I input to get these results:

`gomwuStats(input, goDatabase, goAnnotations, goDivision,
perlPath="perl",
largest=0.1,
smallest=5,
clusterCutHeight=0.25

results=gomwuPlot(input,goAnnotations,goDivision,
absValue=1, # un-remark this if you are using log2-fold changes
level1=0.01,
level2=0.001,
level3=0.0001,
txtsize=1.2,
treeHeight=0.5`

I set the levels to very small p-values because otherwise I ususally have >200 categories which makes the plot difficult to view. Is there a setting I'm missing?

Thank you!
fam26_BP_lfc_plot

@z0on
Copy link
Owner

z0on commented May 14, 2024 via email

@magnew1
Copy link
Author

magnew1 commented May 14, 2024

Great, thank you for clarifying!

@magnew1 magnew1 closed this as completed May 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants