Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply more ZEP 1 feedback #171

Merged
merged 23 commits into from Dec 1, 2022

Conversation

jstriebel
Copy link
Member

@jstriebel jstriebel commented Nov 21, 2022

This PR applies review feedback from the ZEP1 review in PR #149. Most changes are clarifications and wording corrections. The only further reaching changes are about metadata_key_suffix and metadata_encoding, explained below. The changes for those fields are not finalized yet, and should be discussed further in #174, separate from this PR, to unblock the other changes. Sorry about mixing those up. If the related changes do not seem acceptable for the moment, I'd rather fall back to removing them and solve this in a separate issue/PR.

Non editorial changes:

  • Moved metadata_key_suffix into the metadata_encoding metadata field, specifying only the encoding schema there, not the metadata content. Changed metadata_encoding to be an extension point.

docs/core/v3.0.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/core/v3.0.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/core/v3.0.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/core/v3.0.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jstriebel jstriebel added the core-protocol-v3.0 Issue relates to the core protocol version 3.0 spec label Nov 24, 2022
@jstriebel jstriebel changed the title [WIP] Apply more ZEP 1 feedback Apply more ZEP 1 feedback Nov 24, 2022
@jstriebel jstriebel marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2022 14:25
Copy link
Contributor

@rabernat rabernat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking good.

I noted an inconsistency in how we are identifying the root node.

docs/core/v3.0.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/core/v3.0.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/core/v3.0.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/core/v3.0.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/core/v3.0.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rabernat rabernat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking good.

I noted an inconsistency in how we are identifying the root node.

@jstriebel
Copy link
Member Author

@jbms @rabernat Is there anything else missing IYO? I'd love to merge this soon to avoid conflicts and to have the feedback incorporated into https://zarr-specs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/core/v3.0.html.

@rabernat rabernat merged commit 411c573 into zarr-developers:main Dec 1, 2022
@jstriebel jstriebel deleted the apply-more-zep1-feedback branch December 1, 2022 14:17
@jstriebel
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @rabernat 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-protocol-v3.0 Issue relates to the core protocol version 3.0 spec
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants