building with vite

[tpluscode]

Replaced webpack with vite:

• reduced bundle size
• made dev env faster
• knock off all current dependabot alerts

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a0e3744

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
@zazuko/spex	Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[ludovicm67]

Great idea, looks good from what I can see.

Once it's released, I will try also to see if everything is still in order for the Trifid plugin :)

[tpluscode]

Once it's released, I will try also to see if everything is still in order for the Trifid plugin :)

Big change is that the default package export is not UMD but ESM. This should work better, with code splitting.
Also, I'm unsure about PWA...

[ludovicm67]

I added @vitejs/plugin-vue as dev dependency, as I was getting the following error:

error during build:
Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package '@vitejs/plugin-vue' imported from …

I also made sure that the lock file includes entries for different architectures for rollup, so that we can build the app using different CPU architectures.

[ludovicm67]

I did more deeper checks, and I think some changes could be great.

Once it's released, I will try also to see if everything is still in order for the Trifid plugin :)

Big change is that the default package export is not UMD but ESM. This should work better, with code splitting. Also, I'm unsure about PWA...

As I can see, it's exporting the UMD mostly like before: in dist/spex.umd.cjs (it's now with .cjs extension instead of .js).

Also, dist/style.css is the replacement for dist/spex.css.

If we want to rename those files, should we consider a major version instead of a minor one? If not, can we make sure they get the same name as before?

[tpluscode]

If we want to rename those files, should we consider a major version instead of a minor one? If not, can we make sure they get the same name as before?

For 0.x versions, minor bump is considered a breaking change.

[ludovicm67]

Oh yes, you are right, we are still on 0.x.
So a breaking change is that paths are also changing as reported.

LGTM.

[tpluscode]

I mentioned the path changes in the changeset