upper limit on transaction amount #141
Labels
A-consensus
Area: Consensus rules
C-future-proofing
Category: Changes that minimise the effects of shocks and stresses of future events.
I-privacy
Problems and improvements related to privacy.
not in 1.0
use case
This is the
v_limit
feature proposed at the Boulder summit. A Pour transaction declares a publicv_limit
and proves in zero knowledge thatv1_old
+v2_old
<=v_limit
. This may or may not be useful for auditing and anti-money-laundering. At the summit we thought that it might be a good idea to add support for it in the ZK proof (which is easy), but effectively switch it off by hard-codingv_limit
to 2^64.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: