-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ZIP 1014, based on ZIP 1012 with modifications from the Zcash Foundation board #308
Conversation
utACK I support these revisions, and in particular making the Major Grant Review Committee autonomous and binding, and the improved Funding Target update mechanism. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial suggestions.
zip-1012.rst
Outdated
@@ -3,17 +3,21 @@ | |||
ZIP: 1012 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(wearing ZIP Editor hat) I believe that this should be published as a new ZIP since it has substantive changes from ZIP 1012, and it's necessary to preserve the historical record of ZIP 1012 as voted on.
For the time being, the PR can continue to update ZIP 1012 for ease of seeing the changes, but I will change it to ZIP 1014 before publication, unless anyone raises an objection.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we publish earlier and move to ZIP 1014 @daira @gtank ? @zookozcash and I think for polling it would be nicer for folks to see it on https://zips.z.cash/ . I'd be happy to accept all these changes and get it ready to make it an easier PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that my "Approve" review indicates only ZIP Editor approval to publish as ZIP 1014, and is not an indication of approval to the content by ECC. ECC had published its response here: https://electriccoin.co/blog/dev-funds-should-be-in-zcash-not-united-states-dollars/
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Addresses a FAQ on how Volatility Reserve is meant to work. No normative changes.
ZIP 1014 Volatility Reserve clarifications
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK with suggestions (mainly RFC 2119 conformance language).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK with suggestions (mainly RFC 2119 conformance language).
(Speaking for myself.) I made a couple of comments on the forum regarding the status of ECC in applying for Major Grants: https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/community-sentiment-polling-results-nu4/35560/223 |
Clarify language around the criteria for awarding major grants. No normative changes intended, other than removal of "new" in item 4, which conflicts with the "maintain the existing teams and capabilities" goal of this ZIP.
ZIP 1014: Clarify Major Grant criteria
ZIP 1014: fix typo ("voting mechanism")
Regarding the RFC 2119 changes ("SHALL", etc.): Is there a consensus among the ZIP editors that these changes are desirable? If so, I'll review them and submit a pull request. I very mildly prefer to not make the change to RFC 2119 language, because they make it more difficult to see the differences from ZIP 1012, and because to me it feels awkward to use this formal language for terms that (by necessity) fuzzy. |
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Superceded by #312. |
Opening this PR for discussion/comments from ECC and the community.