Enable certain dispatchable calls in smart contracts

[sea212]

What does it do?

Removes the certain functions of AssetManager, PredictionMarkets and Swaps from the contracts call filters.

What important points should reviewers know?

The enabled dispatchable calls should be safe to be used within smart contracts as deleting a smart contract does not lead to unresolvable situations.
In addition to that, once smart contracts utilize dispatchable calls, those dispatchable calls must remain available to guarantee proper functioning of the smart contracts that are already deployed. As there is no value attached to contracts on Battery Station testnet, a changing interface is acceptable in exchange for the capability to test upcoming features early.
Lastly, the call_runtime function cannot be utilized in smart contracts although the runtime is prepared for this in this PR. Based on the advise from Parity's Ink! team, call_runtime will be available as an unstable feature from polkadot-v0.9.33 onwards and as a stable features from polkadot-v0.9.42.

Is there something left for follow-up PRs?

• The feature unstable-interface will be replaced by a Config type for pallet-contracts

What alternative implementations were considered?

Are there relevant PRs or issues?

References

• https://github.com/paritytech/ink
• https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/tree/polkadot-v0.9.32/frame/contracts
• https://docs.substrate.io/build/smart-contracts-strategy/

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1041 (f9d0fdf) into main (37e1a16) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1041   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.94%   92.94%           
=======================================
  Files          92       92           
  Lines       21581    21581           
=======================================
  Hits        20058    20058           
  Misses       1523     1523           

Flag	Coverage Δ
tests	92.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[FrankBevr]

Edit
Got pm, that helped. Thanks 🤗

Hola Harald 👋

@sea212

🥅 Goal

We wanna include one chain extension call.
Something simple, but works. would be fantastic.

❓ Problem

How do we include a chain extenstion in our contract?

ℹ️ Context

Toggle some context

Pat, Tom and me are the guys who wanna test this chain extension.

We have a contract. The contract is simple. Its with purpose.
SwipePM - Hack

The contract looks:

classDiagram
    class football_match
    football_match : +i32 winner
    football_match : +AccountId participant_chelsea
    football_match : +AccountID participant_manchester
    football_match : +new()

    class FootballMatch
    <<interface>> FootballMatch
    FootballMatch : get_game()
    FootballMatch : set_winner()
    FootballMatch : set_participant_chelsea()
    FootballMatch : set_participant_manchester()
    
    FootballMatch <|-- football_match

Loading

Current Ressources
UseInkDocs
InkExample

Note
People assume if you give them similar code, they can make automatically the "transferleistung" to their code.
Yeah thats not the case 😅

❗ ❓ Solutions

• Option A(Default): Give my best, see what happens
• Option B: Someone takes an hour, sits next to me and we tinker together.
• Option C: ?? ...

Cheers Frank ✌️

P.s. Malte gave me this link, so I just put this thing in here. I know its a bit out of context to this PR. But yeah, it relates, so thats fine🐵

[mergify]

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it @sea212? 🙏