Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pay_all_debts.groovy:38-40: Add test for pay_all_depts... #903

Open
0pdd opened this issue Apr 8, 2018 · 29 comments
Open

pay_all_debts.groovy:38-40: Add test for pay_all_depts... #903

0pdd opened this issue Apr 8, 2018 · 29 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Apr 8, 2018

The puzzle 696-65091594 from #696 has to be resolved:

* @todo #696:30min Add test for pay_all_depts stakeholder script.
* It is not possible because payments are not testable. It should be
* fixed in #565 ticket.

The puzzle was created by g4s8 on 02-Apr-18.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 8, 2018

@yegor256/z please, pay attention to this issue

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 8, 2018

@0pdd/z this project will fix the problem faster if you donate a few dollars to it; just click here and pay via Stripe, it's very fast, convenient and appreciated; thanks a lot!

@0crat 0crat added the scope label Apr 8, 2018
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 8, 2018

Job #903 is now in scope, role is DEV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 5, 2018

The job #903 assigned to @g4s8/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@g4s8
Copy link
Collaborator

g4s8 commented Jun 26, 2018

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 26, 2018

@0crat refuse (here)

@g4s8 The user @g4s8/z resigned from #903, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 26, 2018

Tasks refusal is discouraged, see §6: -15 point(s) just awarded to @g4s8/z

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 28, 2018

The job #903 assigned to @krzyk/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@krzyk
Copy link
Contributor

krzyk commented Jul 3, 2018

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jul 3, 2018

@0crat refuse (here)

@krzyk The user @krzyk/z resigned from #903, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jul 3, 2018

Tasks refusal is discouraged, see §6: -15 point(s) just awarded to @krzyk/z

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jul 7, 2018

The job #903 assigned to @carlosmiranda/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@carlosmiranda
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat wait for completion of #1069, it's a blocker.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jul 9, 2018

@0crat wait for completion of #1069, it's a blocker. (here)

@carlosmiranda The impediment for #903 was registered successfully by @carlosmiranda/z

@g4s8
Copy link
Collaborator

g4s8 commented Mar 14, 2019

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 14, 2019

@0crat refuse (here)

@g4s8 The user @carlosmiranda/z resigned from #903, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Oct 13, 2019

The job #903 assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

@g4s8 how do you choose the prefix in the bundle names? Do I put anything unique or is there some rule there?

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat waiting for ARC answer

@g4s8
Copy link
Collaborator

g4s8 commented Oct 21, 2019

@victornoel yes, it's a workaround for BundleTest, it should be any unique string

@0crat 0crat added the waiting label Oct 21, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Oct 21, 2019

@0crat waiting for ARC answer (here)

@victornoel The impediment for #903 was registered successfully by @victornoel/z

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

@g4s8 thanks, and another question: the todo is coming from #696 which doesn't apply to zld payment method (zld is always paid directly). Since zld is the unique payment method, what should we be testing for as a starter? Just that debts are paid?

@g4s8
Copy link
Collaborator

g4s8 commented Oct 21, 2019

@victornoel we have FkBank implementation which is called by Payroll when testing. You can use this class for test.

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse

The current architecture is too complex for me to handle this :)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 15, 2020

@0crat refuse The current architecture is too complex for me to handle this :) (here)

@victornoel The user @victornoel/z resigned from #903, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 15, 2020

Tasks refusal is discouraged (job refused in 3007 hours), see §6: -20 point(s) just awarded to @victornoel/z

@0crat 0crat removed the waiting label Apr 17, 2020
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 17, 2020

The job #903 assigned to @loro2/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@loro2
Copy link
Contributor

loro2 commented Apr 18, 2020

@refuse

No time atm, going for vacation

@loro2
Copy link
Contributor

loro2 commented Apr 19, 2020

@0crat refuse

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants