Problem: zsock header not amenable to generation using CLASS api

[twhittock]

I'd like to change the definition from this pattern:

#ifdef ZSOCK_NOCHECK
#define zsock_new(t) zsock_new_(t, NULL, 0)
#else
#define zsock_new(t) zsock_new_(t, __FILE__, __LINE__)
#endif
zsock_t *zsock_new_(int type, const char *fn, int ln);

to something more like this:

zsock_t *zsock_new(int type);

#if !defined(ZSOCK_NOCHECK) // double negative - would like to use ZSOCK_CHECK instead.
inline void zsock_new__checked(int type, const char *fn, int ln)
{
    zsock_t *ret = zsock_new(type);
    zsock_register(ret, fn, ln);
    return ret;
}
#define zsock_new(t) zsock_new__checked(t, __FILE__, __LINE)
#endif

[hintjens]

Sure, sounds good.
On Feb 22, 2015 2:42 PM, "twhittock" notifications@github.com wrote:

I'd like to change the definition from this pattern:

#ifdef ZSOCK_NOCHECK
#define zsock_new(t) zsock_new_(t, NULL, 0)
#else
#define zsock_new(t) zsock_new_(t, FILE, LINE)
#endifzsock_t *zsock_new_(int type, const char *fn, int ln);

to something more like this:

zsock_t *zsock_new(int type);

#if !defined(ZSOCK_NOCHECK) // double negative - would like to use ZSOCK_CHECK instead.inline void zsock_new__checked(int type, const char *fn, int ln)
{
zsock_t *ret = zsock_new(type);
zsock_register(ret, fn, ln);
return ret;
}
#endif

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#935.