Problem: Zyre still uses LGPL+SLE license #327

hintjens · 2015-09-01T09:36:38Z

c-rack · 2015-09-01T09:38:14Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

stephen-wolf · 2015-09-01T09:46:01Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

sappo · 2015-09-01T09:47:13Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

l00mi · 2015-09-01T09:51:28Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

twhittock · 2015-09-01T10:03:38Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

On 1 September 2015 at 10:36, Pieter Hintjens notifications@github.com
wrote:

Solution: migrate to MPLv2, as explained here
http://zeromq.org/area:licensing

@twhittock https://github.com/twhittock @miniway
https://github.com/miniway @sappo https://github.com/sappo @jemc
https://github.com/jemc @pijyoi https://github.com/pijyoi @Jossgray
https://github.com/jossgray @mditzel https://github.com/mditzel
@vperron https://github.com/vperron @cekoski
https://github.com/cekoski @m-marsella https://github.com/m-marsella
@moteus https://github.com/moteus @keent https://github.com/keent
@badbug0101 https://github.com/badbug0101 @mvala
https://github.com/mvala @l00mi @c-rack https://github.com/c-rack
@sphaero https://github.com/sphaero @codebrainz
https://github.com/codebrainz @stephen-wolf
https://github.com/stephen-wolf @shancat https://github.com/shancat

Could you kindly reply "I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre
under the MPLv2 license"?

If you have any objection to relicensing your contributions, let me know
the reasons. Thanks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#327.

hintjens · 2015-09-01T10:05:10Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

iMatix Corporation hereby agrees to publish all its contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

moteus · 2015-09-01T10:05:40Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

ishworgurung · 2015-09-01T11:01:36Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

On 1 September 2015 at 19:36, Pieter Hintjens notifications@github.com
wrote:

Solution: migrate to MPLv2, as explained here
http://zeromq.org/area:licensing

@twhittock https://github.com/twhittock @miniway
https://github.com/miniway @sappo https://github.com/sappo @jemc
https://github.com/jemc @pijyoi https://github.com/pijyoi @Jossgray
https://github.com/jossgray @mditzel https://github.com/mditzel
@vperron https://github.com/vperron @cekoski
https://github.com/cekoski @m-marsella https://github.com/m-marsella
@moteus https://github.com/moteus @keent https://github.com/keent
@badbug0101 https://github.com/badbug0101 @mvala
https://github.com/mvala @l00mi @c-rack https://github.com/c-rack
@sphaero https://github.com/sphaero @codebrainz
https://github.com/codebrainz @stephen-wolf
https://github.com/stephen-wolf @shancat https://github.com/shancat

Could you kindly reply "I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre
under the MPLv2 license"?

If you have any objection to relicensing your contributions, let me know
the reasons. Thanks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#327.

Ishwor Gurung

keent · 2015-09-01T11:47:37Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

vperron · 2015-09-01T12:01:33Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Gran Ville Lintao notifications@github.com
wrote:

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#327 (comment).

Victor

pijyoi · 2015-09-01T14:17:23Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

jemc · 2015-09-01T14:58:13Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license 👍

codebrainz · 2015-09-02T00:50:54Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

... all 3 lines I changed in some ancillary build system file :)

hintjens · 2015-09-02T21:18:13Z

@miniway @Jossgray @mditzel @cekoski @m-marsella @mvala @sphaero @shancat

Ping, can you respond please? Thanks.

keent · 2015-09-03T09:55:36Z

@hintjens I think there should be a guide in the C4.1 about changing/upgrading licenses that mentions whenever the number of collective owners/collaborator greater than 50% of the total (excluding inactive contributors for whatever reason they're inactive) agrees to upgrade license then the relicensing should proceed .

hintjens · 2015-09-03T10:13:44Z

This wouldn't stand, legally. Every author has to explicitly license their work. Today they do this by the act of pushing their patched fork back to GitHub. Asking for different permissions means adding a manual step. We used to do this in ZeroMQ, it was a hassle.

It would also be unfair to minority contributors, and half the point of the current scheme is to make relicensing difficult.

We already went through this with CZMQ. A minority of authors don't respond to emails and have to be chased up by hand. A small number don't respond at all, and their code can be removed/rewritten.

mvala · 2015-09-03T10:19:58Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

Asmod4n · 2015-09-03T10:25:05Z

@hintjens
Just looked at the czmq issue tracker and my inbox, haven't found anything?

cekoski · 2015-09-03T10:27:22Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

Chad Koski

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 1, 2015, at 5:36 AM, Pieter Hintjens notifications@github.com wrote:

Solution: migrate to MPLv2, as explained here http://zeromq.org/area:licensing

@twhittock @miniway @sappo @jemc @pijyoi @Jossgray @mditzel @vperron @cekoski @m-marsella @moteus @keent @badbug0101 @mvala @l00mi @c-rack @sphaero @codebrainz @stephen-wolf @shancat

Could you kindly reply "I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license"?

If you have any objection to relicensing your contributions, let me know the reasons. Thanks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

hintjens · 2015-09-03T10:28:53Z

@Asmod4n it's in the Zyre issue tracker and the link to this page is #327

... hang on, not sure what we're talking about here. I don't see you on the Zyre authors list.

mditzel · 2015-09-03T10:44:39Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

Regards,
Maarten

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Pieter Hintjens notifications@github.com
wrote:

Solution: migrate to MPLv2, as explained here
http://zeromq.org/area:licensing

@twhittock https://github.com/twhittock @miniway
https://github.com/miniway @sappo https://github.com/sappo @jemc
https://github.com/jemc @pijyoi https://github.com/pijyoi @Jossgray
https://github.com/jossgray @mditzel https://github.com/mditzel
@vperron https://github.com/vperron @cekoski
https://github.com/cekoski @m-marsella https://github.com/m-marsella
@moteus https://github.com/moteus @keent https://github.com/keent
@badbug0101 https://github.com/badbug0101 @mvala
https://github.com/mvala @l00mi @c-rack https://github.com/c-rack
@sphaero https://github.com/sphaero @codebrainz
https://github.com/codebrainz @stephen-wolf
https://github.com/stephen-wolf @shancat https://github.com/shancat

Could you kindly reply "I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre
under the MPLv2 license"?

If you have any objection to relicensing your contributions, let me know
the reasons. Thanks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#327.

sphaero · 2015-09-03T10:52:47Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

Regards,

Arnaud

keent · 2015-09-03T11:10:30Z

@hintjens Thanks for shedding light on the history and legalities

I think @Asmod4n is talking about the same licensing issue that happened on CZMQ.

jemc · 2015-09-03T14:35:58Z

@keent

I think there should be a guide in the C4.1 about changing/upgrading licenses that mentions whenever the number of collective owners/collaborator greater than 50% of the total (excluding inactive contributors for whatever reason they're inactive) agrees to upgrade license then the relicensing should proceed .

Such a policy would probably have to be coupled with a contributor license agreement (CLA) that each contributor signs in order to be legally sound. And as @hintjens mentioned, it would be somewhat contrary to the intentions of our contribution policies anyway.

ghost · 2015-09-04T07:51:02Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

eclazi · 2015-09-09T13:23:28Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license

miniway · 2015-09-10T01:16:22Z

I also agree with that

hintjens · 2015-09-13T10:34:26Z

This didn't get caught by Github:

Delivered-To: pieterh@gmail.com
From: Dongmin Yu <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: zeromq/zyre 
To: zeromq/zyre <zyre@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com>
In-Reply-To: <zeromq/zyre/issues/327@github.com>
Subject: Re: [zyre] Problem: Zyre still uses LGPL+SLE license (#327)
Mime-Version: 1.0

I also agree with that

hintjens · 2015-09-13T10:35:22Z

@m-marsella seems to have no contributions in the code base, I'm checking him off.

hintjens · 2015-09-13T10:36:40Z

@awynne as your patches came in after we opened this issue, could you state your agreement? Then we're set for relicensing... :)

Asmod4n · 2015-09-13T18:10:32Z

I hereby agree to publish my contributions to Zyre under the MPLv2 license.

Solution: move to MPLv2, with approval of all contributors Fixes zeromq#327

awynne · 2015-09-14T00:18:39Z

I agree to publish my contributions under MPLv2

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:54 PM Joe Eli McIlvain notifications@github.com
wrote:

Closed #327 #327 via #334
#334.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#327 (comment).

The project switched to MPLv2.0: zeromq/zyre#327 Fixes http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/88f/88fa0b150ad83e42625666cbffdf95ee178015cb/ Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>

hintjens added a commit to hintjens/zyre that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2015

Problem: Zyre uses LGPLv3 + SLE license

983cd31

Solution: move to MPLv2, with approval of all contributors Fixes zeromq#327

hintjens mentioned this issue Sep 13, 2015

Problem: Zyre uses LGPLv3 + SLE license #334

Merged

jemc closed this as completed in #334 Sep 13, 2015

hintjens referenced this issue in rubinius/rubinius Jan 3, 2016

Break up old/new license & clarify what we use

243c0b2

hintjens mentioned this issue Feb 15, 2016

What is the status of the MPL license changes to this project? zeromq/jeromq#326

Closed

robertodr mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2017

Re-licensing under the Mozilla Public License version 2 dftlibs/xcfun#17

Closed

11 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Problem: Zyre still uses LGPL+SLE license #327

Problem: Zyre still uses LGPL+SLE license #327

hintjens commented Sep 1, 2015

c-rack commented Sep 1, 2015

stephen-wolf commented Sep 1, 2015

sappo commented Sep 1, 2015

l00mi commented Sep 1, 2015

twhittock commented Sep 1, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 1, 2015

moteus commented Sep 1, 2015

ishworgurung commented Sep 1, 2015

keent commented Sep 1, 2015

vperron commented Sep 1, 2015

pijyoi commented Sep 1, 2015

jemc commented Sep 1, 2015

codebrainz commented Sep 2, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 2, 2015

keent commented Sep 3, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 3, 2015

mvala commented Sep 3, 2015

Asmod4n commented Sep 3, 2015

cekoski commented Sep 3, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 3, 2015

mditzel commented Sep 3, 2015

sphaero commented Sep 3, 2015

keent commented Sep 3, 2015

jemc commented Sep 3, 2015

ghost commented Sep 4, 2015

eclazi commented Sep 9, 2015

miniway commented Sep 10, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 13, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 13, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 13, 2015

Asmod4n commented Sep 13, 2015

awynne commented Sep 14, 2015

Problem: Zyre still uses LGPL+SLE license #327

Problem: Zyre still uses LGPL+SLE license #327

Comments

hintjens commented Sep 1, 2015

c-rack commented Sep 1, 2015

stephen-wolf commented Sep 1, 2015

sappo commented Sep 1, 2015

l00mi commented Sep 1, 2015

twhittock commented Sep 1, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 1, 2015

moteus commented Sep 1, 2015

ishworgurung commented Sep 1, 2015

keent commented Sep 1, 2015

vperron commented Sep 1, 2015

pijyoi commented Sep 1, 2015

jemc commented Sep 1, 2015

codebrainz commented Sep 2, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 2, 2015

keent commented Sep 3, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 3, 2015

mvala commented Sep 3, 2015

Asmod4n commented Sep 3, 2015

cekoski commented Sep 3, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 3, 2015

mditzel commented Sep 3, 2015

sphaero commented Sep 3, 2015

keent commented Sep 3, 2015

jemc commented Sep 3, 2015

ghost commented Sep 4, 2015

eclazi commented Sep 9, 2015

miniway commented Sep 10, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 13, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 13, 2015

hintjens commented Sep 13, 2015

Asmod4n commented Sep 13, 2015

awynne commented Sep 14, 2015