Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add NetBSD libc as a cross compilation target #2877

Open
Tracked by #1002
andrewrk opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Open
Tracked by #1002

add NetBSD libc as a cross compilation target #2877

andrewrk opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
contributor friendly This issue is limited in scope and/or knowledge of Zig internals. enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. os-netbsd
Milestone

Comments

@andrewrk
Copy link
Member

andrewrk commented Jul 12, 2019

Extracted from #514.

This is needed for NetBSD to become a tier 1 target.

The example set by glibc can be followed.

See also this wiki page: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/wiki/Updating-libc

@andrewrk andrewrk added enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. contributor friendly This issue is limited in scope and/or knowledge of Zig internals. os-netbsd labels Jul 12, 2019
@andrewrk andrewrk added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Jul 12, 2019
@daurnimator
Copy link
Contributor

@cryo

@nikkicoon
Copy link
Contributor

nikkicoon commented Mar 31, 2023

I'm interested in picking this up, but will have some questions in the future.
For now: The glibc example uses tools/process_headers.zig, would a requirement for this include adding netbsd to this file as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contributor friendly This issue is limited in scope and/or knowledge of Zig internals. enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. os-netbsd
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants