Ability to add cache entries directly, bypassing the Lookup function

[ithinkicancode]

Motivation

In some scenarios, we might want to add a value to the cache directly without calling the lookup function. An example of such business logic is we have some special values that don't exist in the database (from which the lookup function retrieves values), nonetheless we want to serve these special values by injecting them directly into the cache.

Considerations

The decision to bypass lookup is most likely determined by some external conditions. Currently the Lookup function has the following signature:

def lookup(key: Key): ZIO[Environment, Error, Value]

And this function is provided upfront during the construction of the cache, when the conditions to bypass might not be available.

We'd probably either need to express the conditions and the value to add through Environment, or need to add additional (optional) parameters to the lookup function.

[fanf]

This is important and what currently make us unable to use zio-cache. Our use case is that we have data persisted in base. When the app starts, or after a cache reset (which means we also need #43), we would load data from the base using the provided lookup method.
But we have only one way to create new values for these data (A Big Computation (tm)). It makes little sens to persist in base and make the cache go lookup here (in terms of IO) when we know that the data is updated. Plus it would help keep our consistancy model unchanged ((the cache is the law).

[DiegoTavares]

This is also in our way to start using zio-cache.

[calvinlfer]

Hey all, I would find this useful as well as another use case to motivate this is the bulk addition of values into the cache.
The other way is perhaps to enable to Lookup function to support bulk retrieval and allow many keys to be provided

[adamgfraser]

Yes I think supporting looking up a collection of values would be a better way to support this. I have an outstanding PR to add this that I will update.

[sinha-abhi]

@adamgfraser I think you're referring to this PR #143. Do you have an ETA on when that will be added in/if there are still plans to support multi-lookup?