Reduce allocations #7365
Merged
Reduce allocations #7365
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@shawjef3 Awesome catch. Did you get all of the |
jdegoes
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2022
|
@jdegoes I did minimal changes to make the boxing go away. There's some |
|
@shawjef3 If you have the interest and time, I'd love to see them all go away! |
This was referenced Sep 25, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This branch significantly reduces allocations in the runtime. The following shows allocations for
ZIO.unit.foreverbefore the commits and then after. Note that after the changes,scala.runtime.ObjectRefandscala.runtime.IntRefno longer appear on the list of top allocations.I got the measurement by doing memory profiling with VisualVM, setting the profiled classes to
*, and disablingTrack only live objects.