Use ZLIB_INCLUDE_DIRS from FindZLIB instead of ZLIB_INCLUDE_DIR.

[nmoinvaz]

ZLIB_INCLUDE_DIRS is set by FindZLIB if ZLIB_INCLUDE_DIR is set on the command line.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.04 ⚠️

Comparison is base (fa9bfed) 83.18% compared to head (101380a) 83.14%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1474      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    83.18%   83.14%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          130      130              
  Lines        10772    10759      -13     
  Branches      2757     2760       +3     
===========================================
- Hits          8961     8946      -15     
- Misses        1137     1138       +1     
- Partials       674      675       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos_clang	42.97% <ø> (ø)
macos_gcc	72.97% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
ubuntu_clang	82.25% <ø> (+0.25%)	⬆️
ubuntu_clang_debug	81.92% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
ubuntu_clang_inflate_allow_invalid_dist	81.91% <ø> (+0.06%)	⬆️
ubuntu_clang_inflate_strict	82.24% <ø> (+0.06%)	⬆️
ubuntu_clang_mmap	82.34% <ø> (-0.16%)	⬇️
ubuntu_clang_pigz	14.15% <ø> (-0.31%)	⬇️
ubuntu_clang_pigz_no_optim	11.56% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️
ubuntu_clang_pigz_no_threads	13.92% <ø> (-0.33%)	⬇️
ubuntu_clang_reduced_mem	82.74% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc	74.49% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64	76.66% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_compat_no_opt	75.01% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_no_acle	75.56% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_no_neon	75.55% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_armhf	76.74% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_compat_no_opt	74.98% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_no_acle	76.69% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_no_neon	76.57% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_armsf	74.04% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_armsf_compat_no_opt	73.51% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_benchmark	73.00% <ø> (-0.14%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_compat_no_opt	76.08% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_compat_sprefix	73.03% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_m32	72.68% <ø> (-0.16%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_mingw_i686	72.92% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_mingw_x86_64	73.07% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_no_avx2	73.71% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_no_ctz	74.09% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_no_ctzll	74.11% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_no_pclmulqdq	73.65% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_no_sse2	73.81% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_no_sse4	?
ubuntu_gcc_no_sse42	73.59% <ø> (?)
ubuntu_gcc_o1	73.49% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_osb	?
ubuntu_gcc_pigz	38.34% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_pigz_aarch64	39.28% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_ppc	73.32% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_ppc64	73.78% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_ppc64le	73.87% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_ppc_no_power8	74.00% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_s390x	74.19% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_dfltcc	71.39% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_dfltcc_compat	73.29% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_no_crc32	73.98% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_sparc64	74.22% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_sprefix	72.84% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️
win64_gcc	73.33% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
win64_gcc_compat_no_opt	74.15% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 22 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.