-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
boxes: Disable cycling using arrow keys if recipient is invalid. #864
Open
zee-bit
wants to merge
2
commits into
zulip:main
Choose a base branch
from
zee-bit:issue_779
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why aren't we using
widget_size
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I tried using
widget_size
, but for some cases, thewrite-box
changes to box widget instead of flow and returns a(maxcol, maxrow)
size instead of just(maxcol, )
. This made the tests fail for such cases. Let me try to dig more into this and see if I can get a fix for this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the late reply. I got busy with other PR's since finding the root+fix of this particular issue was taking forever. :(
I have tried to dig more on this, but it seems like it's an internal
urwid
issue that I am unable to resolve. While looking at this, I realized that the wholewrite_box
is sometimes recognized as "flow widget" for all tests (that's when all the tests pass), but sometimes thewrite_box
is determined as "box widget" for all tests (2 tests fail in this case).I also found that in the latter case, the tests only fail for "DOWN" keypresses, because it can't be handled properly by
super()
i.e. urwid'scontainer.py
. I can fix the whole issue by not letting the "DOWN" keypress being handled by urwid and returning early after manually handling, but it seems to have other side-effects and does not look clean.