-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement Codebase webhook using the Event Hook API #9395
Comments
Hello @zulip/server-integrations members, this issue was labeled with the "area: integrations" label, so you may want to check it out! |
@zulipbot claim |
Welcome to Zulip, @atkm! We just sent you an invite to collaborate on this repository at https://github.com/zulip/zulip/invitations. Please accept this invite in order to claim this issue and begin a fun, rewarding experience contributing to Zulip! Here's some tips to get you off to a good start:
As you work on this issue, you'll also want to refer to the Zulip code contribution guide, as well as the rest of the developer documentation on that site. See you on the other side (that is, the pull request side)! |
@eeshangarg Is this integration already implemented? There is already a page for Codebase. |
@atkm: We have an integration for it, but not a webhook one that uses their dedicated API! If you'd like to take this up, feel free to! Thanks! :) |
@eeshangarg Cool! I'll take a stab at it then. |
Hello @atkm, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days. You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon! |
@zulipbot claim |
Hello @dipu989, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days. You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon! |
@zulipbot claim |
Hello @thedeveloperr, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days. You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon! |
@zulipbot still working. |
@zulipbot claim |
Hello @thedeveloperr, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days. You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon! |
@zulipbot claim |
Hello @thedeveloperr, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days. You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon! |
@zulipbot claim |
Hello @sameerchoubey, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days. You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon! |
@zulipbot I'm still working on this. I would probably open the PR soon. |
…ons." This reverts commit 073ecaa (zulip#9395). This exception handler was overly broad in catching all `OSError`s, and it made debugging harder by hiding the actual exception. Furthermore, we no longer use NFS (zulip#12963), and we’re now getting reports of Windows users running into this message. Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
…ons." This reverts commit 073ecaa (zulip#9395). This exception handler was overly broad in catching all `OSError`s, and it made debugging harder by hiding the actual exception. Furthermore, we no longer use NFS (zulip#12963), and we’re now getting reports of Windows users running into this message. Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Hello @zulip/server-integrations, @zulip/server-refactoring members, this issue was labeled with the "area: integrations", "area: refactoring" labels, so you may want to check it out! |
We currently have a non-webhook integration for Codebase. But Codebase also has a dedicated webhook API called Event Hooks. We should see if we can quickly write a webhook implementation for it at some point.
I might take this up eventually if no one else does! Thanks! :)
@timabbott: FYI :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: