Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated MP: v140 #1649

Conversation

skeshri
Copy link
Contributor

@skeshri skeshri commented Jul 2, 2015

Updated MP : v140

squash updated Pede : v140
@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_5_X milestone Jul 2, 2015
@diguida
Copy link

diguida commented Jul 2, 2015

@skeshri this is the 75X backport of #1648
Let's see the tests going fine there, then we can think of adding also this one.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 17, 2015

@diguida @skeshri Is this PR still desired? If so should we first make it for 76X then backport it?

@diguida
Copy link

diguida commented Aug 17, 2015

@Degano the 76X cycle has it: see #1648 and scram itself:

diguida@cmsdev07 /build/diguida/cmssw/CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-08-13-1100/src $ scram tool info millepede
Tool info as configured in location /build/diguida/cmssw/CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-08-13-1100
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Name : millepede
Version : V04-03-00
++++++++++++++++++++
SCRAM_PROJECT=no
MILLEPEDE_BASE=/afs/cern.ch/cms/sw/ReleaseCandidates/vol1/slc6_amd64_gcc493/external/millepede/V04-03-00
USE=sockets pcre zlib
PATH=/afs/cern.ch/cms/sw/ReleaseCandidates/vol1/slc6_amd64_gcc493/external/millepede/V04-03-00/bin

@diguida
Copy link

diguida commented Aug 17, 2015

I do not see strong arguments against the backport to 75X and 74X.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

I think we were waiting on AlCa to confirm the validation in 76x. This is done now?

On Aug 17, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Salvatore Di Guida notifications@github.com wrote:

I do not see strong arguments against the backport to 75X and 74X.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@diguida
Copy link

diguida commented Aug 17, 2015

@davidlange6 sure, that's what we agreed and performed. I am checking with @skeshri

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 9, 2015

@diguida @skeshri Ping. What's the status of this one?

@skeshri
Copy link
Contributor Author

skeshri commented Oct 9, 2015

Hi Alessandro,

I'm in process of validating it. But due to some error I could not finish
it.
I will update you soon.
On Oct 9, 2015 9:29 AM, "Alessandro Degano" notifications@github.com
wrote:

@diguida https://github.com/diguida @skeshri
https://github.com/skeshri Ping. What's the status of this one?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1649 (comment).

@diguida
Copy link

diguida commented Oct 9, 2015

@skeshri thanks for your response.
Let me check your latest mails in my inbox...

@skeshri
Copy link
Contributor Author

skeshri commented Oct 9, 2015

Let me post the error that I was getting in running pede on tracker
alignment development hn.
On Oct 9, 2015 12:38 PM, "Salvatore Di Guida" notifications@github.com
wrote:

@skeshri https://github.com/skeshri thanks for your response.
Let me check your latest mails in my inbox...


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1649 (comment).

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 6, 2015

@skeshri @diguida What's the status of this PR? Would it still be needed in 75X anyway?

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants