New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update professor2 to 2.3.3 #7712
Conversation
please test |
please test for slc7_ppc64le_gcc11 |
A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for branch IB/CMSSW_12_4_X/master. @smuzaffar, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831b74/23324/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test import-tables had ERRORS ---> test testTables had ERRORS ---> test DRNTest had ERRORS ---> test materialBudgetTrackerPlots had ERRORS and more ... |
assign generators |
New categories assigned: generators @mkirsano,@alberto-sanchez,@SiewYan,@GurpreetSinghChahal,@Saptaparna you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
please test |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831b74/23362/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test lets do another one |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831b74/23376/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@smuzaffar , I do not see the relevancy of the comparison in the context of professor2 upgrade. Most errors come from EGamma's.. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-831b74/23654/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+externals |
+1 Hello, I have no objection. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_12_4_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
No description provided.