BAD PR, NOT REBASED. Fix too many clusters in si pixel cluster producer for 808 #14665
Conversation
…ase monitoring in pclMon
… is smaller than or equal to the latest IOV, exit.
Now it is done if in case |eta|==115 and hits are ONLY in 3 layers out of (7,8,9,17)
It has no effect for MC shince hits with this quality are filtered out, but is usefull for data-MC comparistion (if one remove the filter)
…ing-cleanup-80x Clean-up L1T unpacker warnings
Update OMTF treatment of Muons at edge of OMTF acceptance
Add a cut in the HLTPFJetIDProducer module.
…05-20-2300 Fix for runtestTqafTopEventSelection unit test: use againstElectronVLooseMVA6 instead of againstElectronVLooseMVA5
…kport CTPPS: new DataFormats related to TOTEM RP raw data and digi - backport of PR cms-sw#13837
Fixes for RunInfo O2O and cleanup of PopCon interface (80X)
…-entry-hash-80X Fix for GTEntry_t hash function
|
A new Pull Request was created by @VinInn (Vincenzo Innocente) for CMSSW_8_0_8_patchX. It involves the following packages: Alignment/OfflineValidation @ghellwig, @covarell, @emeschi, @cerminar, @Martin-Grunewald, @rekovic, @vanbesien, @govoni, @perrotta, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @davidlange6, @cvuosalo, @mdhildreth, @deguio, @slava77, @ggovi, @mmusich, @mulhearn, @perrozzi, @thuer, @dmitrijus, @franzoni, @mommsen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are list here #13028 |
VinInn
changed the title
|
need to start from 808patch1 |
|
To be clear, we need both a 80x and s 808patchx pr Cheers, On 27 May 2016, at 17:36, Slava Krutelyov <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: need to start from 808patch1 — |
back port of #14662
require rebase.
if somebody knows how do it from here is welcome