Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pr90x L1T stage2 for phase2 fix #17598

Conversation

rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic rekovic commented Feb 22, 2017

This PR invokes Stage2 L1Trigger for Phase2. It supersedes #17248 and #17462.
It contains:

Original #17248 problems due to HCAL TPs is now fixed (merged #17540).
Overflooding messages from EMTF are silenced as well.

For completion, below is the original PR info:

#17248 PR 90x for change in configuration to use L1T Stage2 (as opposed to L1T Legacy) in Phase2 era. This PR also includes (needed to pass tests) #17260 which fixed crashes in HCAL TPs for Phase2

This PR is needed for Phase2 MC Production.

Details:

  • Use phase2_common era modifier to
    • switch in L1T configuration to use Stage2
    • configure conditions of L1T Muon, Calorimeter, and Global (as in Stage2)
    • configure L1T RAW2DIGI and DIGI2RAW to use Stage2 products
  • Include back in simHcalTrigPrimitiveDigis and simHcalTTPDigis into hcalDigiSequence

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @rekovic for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

L1Trigger/Configuration
L1Trigger/L1TCalorimeter
L1Trigger/L1TGlobal
L1Trigger/L1TMuon
L1Trigger/L1TMuonEndCap
L1Trigger/L1TNtuples
SimCalorimetry/Configuration

@civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @kreczko this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

rekovic commented Feb 22, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 22, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

rekovic commented Feb 23, 2017

+1

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Feb 24, 2017

+1
DT differences for Phase2 are expected?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar


#
# Legacy Trigger:
#
if not (stage1L1Trigger.isChosen() or stage2L1Trigger.isChosen()):
if not (stage1L1Trigger.isChosen() or stage2L1Trigger.isChosen() or phase2_common.isChosen()):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @rekovic - two issues

  1. we agreed to clean up these isChosen..
  2. you don't want to add phase2_common here, rather, you want to add what trigger you want into phase2_common era definition, Then this code is unchanged.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Now in #17629.

@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
+simHcalDigis
*simHcalTTPDigis)

_phase2_hcalDigiSequence = hcalDigiSequence.copyAndExclude([simHcalTriggerPrimitiveDigis,simHcalTTPDigis])
#_phase2_hcalDigiSequence = hcalDigiSequence.copyAndExclude([simHcalTriggerPrimitiveDigis,simHcalTTPDigis])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these lines can just be removed. Perhaps its worth a small PR with just this change as the first step?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Now in #17628 .

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

-1
@rekovic and I have discussed the needed changes

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

rekovic commented Feb 27, 2017

@civanch

DT differences for Phase2 are expected?

I did not understand your question. Could you clarify, please?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants