New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate 4D vertexing and downstream reco to full simulation/reconstruction track timestamps and add TOF PID (10_4_X) #25627
Conversation
…ime of flight particle id
… populate the default offlinePrimaryVertices collections
A new Pull Request was created by @bendavid (Josh Bendavid) for CMSSW_10_4_X. It involves the following packages: CommonTools/RecoAlgos @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
assign upgrade |
New categories assigned: upgrade @kpedro88 you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@bendavid |
Master version is here |
backport of #25628 |
-1 Tested at: 55a63a3 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows: runTheMatrix-results/27434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D35_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D35+RecoFullGlobal_2023D35+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D35/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D35_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D35+RecoFullGlobal_2023D35+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D35.log The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
Pull request #25627 was updated. @perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @slava77, @santocch can you please check and sign again. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
@andrius-k @kpedro88 as for master |
+1 |
@kpedro88 I move forward with integration in order to speed up the release, as this looks the correct backport of what already approved in master. Please sign it in case for reference |
+1 |
merge |
@fabiocos usually I wait to sign backports until they have survived in a master IB, in case of surprises... |
@kpedro88 I agree that this is the normal meaningful procedure, as here we are quite late I tried to get prepared in case of success, given that 10_4_X is dedicated only to this particular purpose and nothing else. Anyway as you may see in master this is not the end of the story... |
Backport of #25628