New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add pileup scenario for 2016 ultra legacy #28595
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28595/13105
|
A new Pull Request was created by @gkrintir (Georgios Konstantinos Krintiras) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/StandardSequences @civanch, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
For more details on this pileup scenario, you can see this talk here: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+operations |
@civanch comments? |
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
@gkrintir Big thanks to TSG for reporting. @missirol @pgunnell @Sam-Harper @gennai @ameyer-cern Here is the distribution I got from this PR From FYI @silviodonato |
Hi @srimanob all, very sorry for that, I am checking what happened here and fixing it. Regards |
Fixed in #29431 |
PR description:
This adds a pileup scenario for the 2016 ultra legacy (periods B-H), generated in the same way as the 2017 and 2018 UL scenaria #26572 and #27201 . The new scenario is named "2016_25ns_UltraLegacy_PoissonOOTPU".