Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eventcontent structure in RecoHI packages #29576

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 30, 2020

Conversation

jeongeun
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Update event content definitions to explicitly have RECO to be a superset of AOD and for FEVT to be a superset of RECO. 5 files changed :

  • RecoHI/Configuration/python/RecoHI_EventContent_cff.py
  • RecoHI/HiCentralityAlgos/python/RecoHiCentrality_EventContent_cff.py
  • RecoHI/HiEvtPlaneAlgos/python/RecoHiEvtPlane_EventContent_cff.py
  • RecoHI/HiMuonAlgos/python/RecoHiMuon_EventContent_cff.py
  • RecoHI/HiTracking/python/RecoHiTracker_EventContent_cff.py

FYI, RecoHI/HiEgammaAlgos/python/RecoHiEgamma_EventContent_cff.py, RecoHI/HiJetAlgos/python/RecoHiJets_EventContent_cff.py files are work in progress and they will be updated in new PRs later (maybe separately).

(The previous tasks are PR#29025, PR#29158, PR#29225, PR#29299, PR#29470, PR#29517, PR#29535, and PR#29571 )

PR validation:

Event Content comparison check was also done and there is no change with these updates.
Tested in CMSSW_11_1_X, the basic test all passed in the CMSSW PR instructions.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29576/14888

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jeongeun (JeongEun Lee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoHI/Configuration
RecoHI/HiCentralityAlgos
RecoHI/HiEvtPlaneAlgos
RecoHI/HiMuonAlgos
RecoHI/HiTracking

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@MiheeJo, @jazzitup, @echapon, @yenjie, @kurtejung, @mandrenguyen, @dgulhan, @yetkinyilmaz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 28, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5890/console Started: 2020/04/28 17:33

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 6b9c94e
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-297ff9/5890/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-28-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-297ff9/5890/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2696435
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2696114
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

#AOD content
RecoHiMuonAOD = cms.PSet(
outputCommands = cms.untracked.vstring()
)

#Add Isolation
from RecoMuon.MuonIsolationProducers.muIsolation_EventContent_cff import *
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where are these RecoMuonIsolationXXX event contents used here, or in the calling configs?
If I am not wrong this import could even be removed here, if we want to clean up the config.
@mandrenguyen ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, it looks like nothing from that import is actually used. If it's not doing anything, might as well remove it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, I will remove it.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29576/14927

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #29576 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 30, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5921/console Started: 2020/04/30 08:51

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: b923b12
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-297ff9/5921/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-29-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-297ff9/5921/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2696435
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2696115
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Structure of the RecoHI event content packages updated according to the plan, with no effect expected on the actual products saved
  • Jenkins tests pass

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants