Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete some orphaned BuildFiles #30228

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 23, 2020
Merged

Delete some orphaned BuildFiles #30228

merged 2 commits into from Jun 23, 2020

Conversation

guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Delete 3 BuildFiles which were actually not building any sources.

PR validation:

CMSSW compiles.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

No backport intended.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30228/16107

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/ESSources
FastSimulation/CTPPSFastTrackingProducer
FastSimulation/L1CaloTriggerProducer
Utilities/ReleaseScripts

@smuzaffar, @ssekmen, @Dr15Jones, @lveldere, @makortel, @tlampen, @christopheralanwest, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @tocheng, @sbein, @ggovi, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@matt-komm, @mmusich, @wddgit, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@pohsun
Copy link

pohsun commented Jun 14, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 14, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 5a2e1d3
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-303f4b/7052/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-14-0000
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-303f4b/7052/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2778811
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2778760
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

private:
void beginStream(edm::StreamID) override;
void produce(edm::Event&, const edm::EventSetup&) override;
void endStream() override;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This probably goes beyond this PR, but beginStream() and endStream() are empty and thus could be removed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure!

void endStream() override;
//this function will only be called once per event
virtual void beginEvent(edm::Event& event, const edm::EventSetup& eventSetup);
virtual void endEvent(edm::Event& event, const edm::EventSetup& eventSetup);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again probably going beyond this PR, but what is the purpose of these functions? As far as I can tell, they are not called.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right, thanks! I removed them.

@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ CMSSW_CATEGORIES={"Operations": ["Configuration/Applications",
"FastSimulation/Configuration", "FastSimulation/EgammaElectronAlgos",
"FastSimulation/Event", "FastSimulation/EventProducer",
"FastSimulation/ForwardDetectors", "FastSimulation/HighLevelTrigger",
"FastSimulation/L1CaloTriggerProducer", "FastSimulation/MaterialEffects",
"FastSimulation/MaterialEffects",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@smuzaffar Could you confirm this is OK given that FastSimulation/L1CaloTriggerProducer package is removed?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this is fine

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-303f4b/7090/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2778811
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2778757
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

+core

@pohsun
Copy link

pohsun commented Jun 17, 2020

+1

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jun 17, 2020

@jan-kaspar , @fabferro , are you OK with this PR?

@fabferro
Copy link
Contributor

@jan-kaspar , @fabferro , are you OK with this PR?

I have nothing against but I would like the confirmation of @mundim that last modified these files within PPS group. @mundim: do you agree with this PR?

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have any objections @ggovi ?

@mundim
Copy link
Contributor

mundim commented Jun 18, 2020

@jan-kaspar , @fabferro , are you OK with this PR?

I have nothing against but I would like the confirmation of @mundim that last modified these files within PPS group. @mundim: do you agree with this PR?

I was not sure about FastSimulation/CTPPSFastTrackingProducer, if this would cause any problem to the PPS fast simulation, but I just found out that (likely) no one is using it. So, I guess you can go on.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jun 19, 2020

+1

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Jun 23, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 86a9f8e into cms-sw:master Jun 23, 2020
@guitargeek guitargeek deleted the fixes_1 branch June 23, 2020 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants