New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update nano modifiers #32463
Update nano modifiers #32463
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32463/20367
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mariadalfonso for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Eras @gouskos, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @wajidalikhan, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @franzoni, @fgolf, @qliphy, @mariadalfonso, @santocch, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test workflow 136.8523 |
-1 Failed Tests: Python3 #Python3 I found errors: *** Error compiling 'src/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanogen_cff.py'... |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32463/20369
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-341cb0/11786/summary.html DAS Queries failed Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+xpog |
For the record: I wanted to add the wf for MC but while only this that explicitly request rucio works |
+upgrade |
+1 |
+1 |
+operations |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
preparation for nanoV9 post reminiUL
TO DO: